Zifnab wrote:
it's a 1.2% reduction (using 2006 daily use numbers) over those 6 months. But a 12% reduction for the month of April compaired to 2007. That sir is a snowball rolling down hill. It cannot be minimized.
China does a nice job of minimizing it. Global market, remember? China increased its oil imports by like 25% in April alone.
sure but there's a metric fuck ton of room for conservation.
I don't think there's as much room as you suggest. Some, yes. But the people who live paycheck to paycheck and don't have a hedge against major price increases (which is a LOT of people) get hurt bigtime. With all due respect, some of us can afford the hurt more than others.
The problem there is there's not a single thing than can be done in the US to increase production for several years down the road. So here's our opportunity. Pay now or pay later. I say we pay now.
Pay for what? Pay to bring oil prices back down to some degree, yet remain dependent upon foreign oil? Oh, joy.
We need to clear the way for the supply side to increase now because it will take several years for full effect. (Though even just clearing
the way will have some degree of immediate impact on speculation, by what I've read.)
What I want to know is why people argue against having a comprehensive solution. What is the attraction of the screw-the-little-guy method of conservation?












